Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Curtis v. Ward, 97-7681 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7681 Visitors: 5
Filed: Mar. 20, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7681 HERBERT CURTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT WARD, Warden of Evans Correctional Institute; STUKEY, Major at Evans Correctional Institute; PAT BROWN, Lieutenant at Evans Correctional Institute; GIBSON, Correctional Officer at Evans Correctional Institute; GRIFFIN, Investigator at Evans Correctional Institute; M. K. GALLOWAY, Head of Grievance at Evans Correctional Institute, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from t
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7681 HERBERT CURTIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ROBERT WARD, Warden of Evans Correctional Institute; STUKEY, Major at Evans Correctional Institute; PAT BROWN, Lieutenant at Evans Correctional Institute; GIBSON, Correctional Officer at Evans Correctional Institute; GRIFFIN, Investigator at Evans Correctional Institute; M. K. GALLOWAY, Head of Grievance at Evans Correctional Institute, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-2515-4-18BE) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Curtis, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Curtis v. Ward, No. CA-97- 2515-4-18BE (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer