Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Simkus v. Robinson, 98-6296 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6296 Visitors: 10
Filed: May 18, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6296 JOHN G. SIMKUS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BISHOP L. ROBINSON; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-97-1947-WMN) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 18, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by u
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6296 JOHN G. SIMKUS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BISHOP L. ROBINSON; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR.; FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-97-1947-WMN) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 18, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John G. Simkus, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Wendy Ann Kronmiller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Simkus v. Robinson, No. CA-97-1947-WMN (D. Md. Feb. 13, 1998). We deny Appellant's motion to terminate the collection of filing fees and motion for expedited treatment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer