Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Yocum v. United States, 97-7623 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7623 Visitors: 40
Filed: May 26, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7623 ELDON LOWELL YOCUM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Central District of Illinois, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-856-5-BO) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirm
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7623 ELDON LOWELL YOCUM, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Central District of Illinois, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-856-5-BO) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eldon Lowell Yocum, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Ac- cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yocum v. United States, No. CA-97-856-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 29, 1997). Ap- pellant's motions for suppression of evidence, for Fed. R. App. P. 9(a) relief, for release, and to show cause are completely merit- less and are hereby denied. We deny Appellant's motions for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer