Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Creed v. NC Attorney General, 97-7608 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7608 Visitors: 13
Filed: May 26, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7608 TIMOTHY LEE CREED, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; J. V. TURLINGTON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Rockingham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-932-3) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7608 TIMOTHY LEE CREED, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; J. V. TURLINGTON, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Rockingham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-932-3) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Timothy Lee Creed, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca Kendrick Cleveland, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Timothy Lee Creed seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certif- icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Creed v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-96-932-3 (M.D.N.C. July 18, 1997). We also deny Creed's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer