Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Bell Atlantic DC v. Zaidi, 98-1061 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-1061 Visitors: 25
Filed: May 26, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1061 BELL ATLANTIC-WASHINGTON, DC, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SYED H. (NAYYAR) ZAIDI, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-467-A) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpubl
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1061 BELL ATLANTIC-WASHINGTON, DC, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SYED H. (NAYYAR) ZAIDI, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CA-97-467-A) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 26, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,* Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Syed H. (Nayyar) Zaidi, Appellant Pro Se. Betty S.W. Graumlich, John Lyons Marshall, Jr., MCSWEENEY, BURTCH & CRUMP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. * Senior Judge Butzner did not participate in consideration of this case. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 46(d). Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Plaintiffs in their civil action and dismissing Appellant's counterclaims. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bell Atlantic DC v. Zaidi, No. CA-97-467-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer