Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. McCullers, 98-6324 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6324 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jun. 03, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6324 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DEMETRIUS LAMONT MCCULLERS, a/k/a Meek, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-51-BO) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublish
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6324 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DEMETRIUS LAMONT MCCULLERS, a/k/a Meek, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-51-BO) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Demetrius Lamont McCullers, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing Appel- lant's motion to compel the Government to make a Fed. R. Crim. P. 35 motion or motion under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual ยง 5K1.1 (1996), for a downward departure based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. McCullers, No. CR-96-51-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer