Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wagner v. K-Mart Corporation, 97-2354 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-2354 Visitors: 39
Filed: Jul. 31, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2354 MICHELLE WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K-MART CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, versus ROBERTS JANITORIAL & FLOOR CARE SERVICE, Third Party Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-33-2-18) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublis
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2354 MICHELLE WAGNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus K-MART CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, versus ROBERTS JANITORIAL & FLOOR CARE SERVICE, Third Party Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-96-33-2-18) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: July 31, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michelle Wagner, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jackson Wills, IV, James Earle Reeves, BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON & HELMS, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the jury’s verdict in this personal in- jury action and the district court’s order denying Appellant’s motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wagner v. K-Mart Corp., No. CA-96-33-2-18 (D.S.C. June 19 & July 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer