Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Braxton v. Bailey, 98-6342 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6342 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 27, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6342 SAVINO BRAXTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHERRY ROBINSON BAILEY, Assistant State’s Attorney, in her individual and official ca- pacity; VERNON S. SKUHR, Maryland Division of Parole Warrant Officer, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-188-JFM) Submitte
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6342 SAVINO BRAXTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHERRY ROBINSON BAILEY, Assistant State’s Attorney, in her individual and official ca- pacity; VERNON S. SKUHR, Maryland Division of Parole Warrant Officer, in his individual and official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-188-JFM) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 27, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Savino Braxton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant, a Maryland inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Braxton v. Bailey, No. CA- 98-188-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer