Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Wheelous v. Garraghty, 97-6859 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-6859 Visitors: 20
Filed: Sep. 02, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DAMON LOUIS WHEELOUS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. No. 97-6859 DAVID GARRAGHTY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA, Respondents-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-97-444-2) Submitted: August 11, 1998 Decided: September 2, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. _ Vacated and remanded by unpub
More
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

DAMON LOUIS WHEELOUS,
Petitioner-Appellant,

v.
                                                                      No. 97-6859
DAVID GARRAGHTY, Warden;
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
VIRGINIA,
Respondents-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-97-444-2)

Submitted: August 11, 1998

Decided: September 2, 1998

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG,
Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Damon Louis Wheelous, Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Damon Louis Wheelous appeals from the district court's order dis-
missing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2254 (West 1994 &
Supp. 1998) as untimely filed. We vacate and remand the district
court's decision. The record does not reveal when Appellant delivered
his petition to the prison authorities for mailing to the court. Accord-
ingly, we grant a certificate of appealability and remand the case for
the district court to determine whether Wheelous' petition was deliv-
ered to prison authorities on or before April 23, 1997, under Houston
v. Lack, 
487 U.S. 266
 (1988). See Brown v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___,
1998 WL 389030
, at *6 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

                    2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer