Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Weaver, 98-6239 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6239 Visitors: 39
Filed: Sep. 01, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6239 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALBERT LARRY WEAVER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-238-A, CA-97-750-AM) Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 1, 1998 Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublishe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6239 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALBERT LARRY WEAVER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-238-A, CA-97-750-AM) Submitted: August 25, 1998 Decided: September 1, 1998 Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Cheryl Johns Sturm, Westtown, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap- pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Weaver, Nos. CR-90-238-A; CA-97-750-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer