Filed: Aug. 31, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1626 MELVIN ABDULLAH EL-AMIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KIEWIT/SHEA, a joint venture; GUSTAV C. VOIGT, M.D., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 98-889-CCB) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublis
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1626 MELVIN ABDULLAH EL-AMIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KIEWIT/SHEA, a joint venture; GUSTAV C. VOIGT, M.D., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 98-889-CCB) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublish..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1626 MELVIN ABDULLAH EL-AMIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KIEWIT/SHEA, a joint venture; GUSTAV C. VOIGT, M.D., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA- 98-889-CCB) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Abdullah El-Amin, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination and related claims. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion, dismissing the action as malicious under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2) (West Supp. 1998), and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. El-Amin v. Kiewit/Shea, No. CA-98-889-CCB (D. Md. Apr. 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ade- quately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
