Filed: Aug. 31, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7462 KEITH VINCENT BROWN, #188678, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3750-6-21-AK) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7462 KEITH VINCENT BROWN, #188678, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3750-6-21-AK) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 3..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7462 KEITH VINCENT BROWN, #188678, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL W. MOORE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; GERALDINE P. MIRO, Warden of Allendale Correctional Institution, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-3750-6-21-AK) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 31, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Vincent Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Coleman Jones, BOGOSLOW & JONES, Walterboro, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have re- viewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Moore, No. CA-96-3750-6-21-AK (D.S.C. Sept. 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2