Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Webb v. Hunt, 98-1605 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-1605 Visitors: 29
Filed: Sep. 11, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1605 PATRICIA ECKSTEIN WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES B. HUNT, JR.; RUFUS L. EDMISTEN; REAGAN HALE WEAVER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-160-7-BR) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circui
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1605 PATRICIA ECKSTEIN WEBB, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES B. HUNT, JR.; RUFUS L. EDMISTEN; REAGAN HALE WEAVER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-160-7-BR) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 11, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Patricia Eckstein Webb, Appellant Pro Se. David Roy Blackwell, As- sistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; David Scott Wisz, Patricia Pursell Kerner, BAILEY & DIXON, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Webb v. Hunt, No. CA-97-160-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer