Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Freas v. Alden, 98-6532 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6532 Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 17, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6532 MICHAEL HOWARD FREAS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JUDGE ALDEN, Circuit Court of Fairfax, Virgin- ia Public Defenders Office; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-1759-AM) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before ERVIN,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6532 MICHAEL HOWARD FREAS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JUDGE ALDEN, Circuit Court of Fairfax, Virgin- ia Public Defenders Office; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-97-1759-AM) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: September 17, 1998 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Howard Freas, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Freas v. Alden, No. CA-97-1759-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 17, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for the production of transcripts at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci- sional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer