Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Flamer v. Rowlett, 98-6837 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6837 Visitors: 46
Filed: Sep. 24, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6837 JOHN ED FLAMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPTAIN ROWLETT, Security Chief; WARDEN BASKERVILLE; B. B. HOLLIFIELD, Lieutenant; DOCTOR FISHER, Mental Health, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-311-2) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOT
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6837 JOHN ED FLAMER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPTAIN ROWLETT, Security Chief; WARDEN BASKERVILLE; B. B. HOLLIFIELD, Lieutenant; DOCTOR FISHER, Mental Health, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-311-2) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 24, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Ed Flamer, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. The district court ordered Appel- lant to either consent to the collection of the filing fee from his inmate account or to submit the full filing fee within thirty days. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(b)(1) (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). The court dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to com- ply with the order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer