Filed: Sep. 22, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-599 In Re: RONALD MCGILL, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-272-5-F-3) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 22, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald McGill, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ronald McGill has filed a petition for a wr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-599 In Re: RONALD MCGILL, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-98-272-5-F-3) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 22, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald McGill, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ronald McGill has filed a petition for a wri..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-599
In Re: RONALD MCGILL,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CA-98-272-5-F-3)
Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 22, 1998
Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald McGill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Ronald McGill has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus
seeking to have this court compel the District Court for the
Eastern District of North Carolina to either issue a writ of habeas
corpus or grant his motion for either a temporary restraining order
or a preliminary injunction. Mandamus is a drastic remedy to be
used only in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States
Dist. Court,
426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976). Because McGill’s habeas
corpus petition has been transferred to the District Court for the
District of South Carolina, his petition for mandamus relief is
moot. Accordingly, although we grant McGill’s motion to proceed in
forma pauperis, we deny his petition for mandamus relief. We also
deny McGill’s motions for a temporary restraining order and/or a
preliminary injunction, to dispense with the requirement of a secu-
rity bond, and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2