Filed: September 29, 1998 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6069 (CA-98-1-R) Virgil Atwell Motley, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus Kenneth Hayter, etc., et al., Defendants - Appellees. O R D E R The court amends its opinion filed September 23, 1998, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 5 -- the panel information is cor- rected to read "Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges." For the Court - By Direction /s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk  UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6069 VIRGIL ATWELL MOTLEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus KENNETH HAYTER, Sheriff, Washington County Sheriff's Department; ROBERT TURNER, Captain, Washington County Jail; ROBERT OWENS, Lieuten- ant, Washington County Sheriff's Department; LARRY WILSON, Sergeant, Washington County Sheriff's Department; BARBARA SPROLES, Ser- geant, Washington County Sheriff's Department; J. LATHAM, Deputy, Washington County Sheriff's Department; R. WANN, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1-R) Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 23, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Virgil Atwell Motley, Appellant Pro Se. 2 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Motley v. Hayter, No. CA-98-1-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 6, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion to expedite his appeal. We dis- pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 4