Filed: Oct. 14, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-628 In Re: JOHNNIE N. ROWE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-11821, CR-94-20097) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnnie N. Rowe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Johnnie Rowe, a North Carolina i
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-628 In Re: JOHNNIE N. ROWE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-94-11821, CR-94-20097) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnnie N. Rowe, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Johnnie Rowe, a North Carolina in..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-628
In Re: JOHNNIE N. ROWE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(CR-94-11821, CR-94-20097)
Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnnie N. Rowe, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Johnnie Rowe, a North Carolina inmate, filed this petition for
a writ of mandamus asking this court to compel the district court
to address on the merits his motion to dismiss his criminal
conviction. The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy
to be used in extraordinary circumstances. See In re Beard,
811
F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). A petitioner must show that he has
a clear right to the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear
duty to perform the act requested by petitioner, and that there is
no other adequate remedy available. See In re First Fed. Sav. &
Loan Ass’n,
860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Rowe has failed to
make the requisite showing for such extraordinary relief. Accord-
ingly, we deny his petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2