Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Crowder v. Kelley, 98-6811 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6811 Visitors: 23
Filed: Oct. 26, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6811 NICHOLAS R. CROWDER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LAWRENCE KELLEY, State’s Attorney; DAVID GOADE, Sheriff for Allegany County, Maryland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 98-1249-S) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismisse
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6811 NICHOLAS R. CROWDER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LAWRENCE KELLEY, State’s Attorney; DAVID GOADE, Sheriff for Allegany County, Maryland, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 98-1249-S) Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Nicholas R. Crowder, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order summarily denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) for failing to exhaust state remedies. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dis- miss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Crowder v. Kelly, No. CA-98-1249-S (D. Md. Apr. 30, 1998).* Appellant’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. His motion’s for habeas corpus relief and bail pending appeal are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED * We note that the dismissal of Crowder’s petition in the district court is without prejudice to his refiling the petition once he has exhausted state remedies. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer