Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Black, 98-6897 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6897 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jan. 19, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6897 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FORREST STEPHEN BLACK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilly, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-277-WS, CA-97-615-6) Submitted: December 30, 1998 Decided: January 19, 1999 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6897 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus FORREST STEPHEN BLACK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilly, Jr., District Judge. (CR-90-277-WS, CA-97-615-6) Submitted: December 30, 1998 Decided: January 19, 1999 Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Forrest Stephen Black, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Forrest Stephen Black seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer- tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Black, Nos. CR-90-277- WS; CA-97-615-6 (M.D.N.C. May 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer