Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Moals v. Sizer, 98-7400 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-7400 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jan. 29, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7400 PAUL SYLVESTER MOALS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3510-AMD) Submitted: January 12, 1999 Decided: January 29, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Di
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7400 PAUL SYLVESTER MOALS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3510-AMD) Submitted: January 12, 1999 Decided: January 29, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Paul Sylvester Moals, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Paul S. Moals seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the rea- soning of the district court. See Moals v. Sizer, No. CA-97-3510- AMD (D. Md. Sept. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer