Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Calleja, 97-7743 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 97-7743 Visitors: 19
Filed: Jan. 26, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7743 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BERNARDO SEGUNDO CALLEJA, a/k/a Beni, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-86-28-R, CA-97-270-R) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublishe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7743 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BERNARDO SEGUNDO CALLEJA, a/k/a Beni, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-86-28-R, CA-97-270-R) Submitted: August 31, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gerald Chester Ruter, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. United States v. Calleja, Nos. CR-86-28-R; CA-97-270- R (W.D. Va. Nov. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer