Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Bryan, 17-4215 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-4215 Visitors: 26
Filed: Jan. 26, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7453 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY BRYAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-76, CA-97-1113-5) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ant
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7453 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY BRYAN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-76, CA-97-1113-5) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Bryan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Anthony Bryan seeks to appeal the district court’s order deny- ing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion agreeing with the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bryan, Nos. CR-96-76; CA-97- 1113-5 (S.D.W. Va. Sept. 23. 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer