Filed: Jan. 26, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2635 VIRGINIA MCDONALD, Petitioner, versus DANTE COAL COMPANY (Badger Coal Company); DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PRO- GRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-2029-BLA) Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2635 VIRGINIA MCDONALD, Petitioner, versus DANTE COAL COMPANY (Badger Coal Company); DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PRO- GRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-2029-BLA) Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2635 VIRGINIA MCDONALD, Petitioner, versus DANTE COAL COMPANY (Badger Coal Company); DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PRO- GRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (95-2029-BLA) Submitted: August 18, 1998 Decided: January 26, 1999 Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George Daniel Blizzard, II, SHAFFER & SHAFFER, Madison, West Vir- ginia, for Petitioner. William Steele Mattingly, JACKSON & KELLY, Morgantown, West Virginia; Patricia May Nece, J. Matthew McCracken, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Virginia McDonald seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1997). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. McDonald v. Dante Coal Company, BRB No. 95-2029-BLA (B.R.B. Sept. 26, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2