Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

In re: Harmon v., 98-1776 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-1776 Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 19, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1776 In Re: RONALD E. HARMON, Debtor. _ RONALD E. HARMON, Debtor - Appellant, versus FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, f/k/a Atlantic National Bank of Florida, Plaintiff - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-131-Y, BK-95-58325-JS, AP-97-5357-JS) Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999 Before WIDENER,
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1776 In Re: RONALD E. HARMON, Debtor. _________________________ RONALD E. HARMON, Debtor - Appellant, versus FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK OF FLORIDA, f/k/a Atlantic National Bank of Florida, Plaintiff - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph H. Young, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-131-Y, BK-95-58325-JS, AP-97-5357-JS) Submitted: January 19, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald E. Harmon, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Blair Hill, Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Ronald E. Harmon appeals from the district court’s order af- firming the bankruptcy court’s determination that a debt owed to First Union National Bank of Florida was nondischargeable in Harmon’s bankruptcy case. We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See First Union Nat’l Bank v. Harmon, Nos. CA-98-131-Y; BK-95-58325-JS; AP-97-5357- JS (D. Md. Apr. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer