Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mills v. Owens, 98-6761 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-6761 Visitors: 50
Filed: Mar. 17, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6761 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6762 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHNNIE WATKINS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6913 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6920 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Co
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6761 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6762 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHNNIE WATKINS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6913 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. No. 98-6920 ALBERT CURTIS MILLS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MR. OWENS, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 97-3334-DKC, CA-97-3335-DKC) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Nos. 98-6761 and 98-6762 dismissed and Nos. 98-6913 and 98-6920 affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Albert Curtis Mills appeals various district court orders in two 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) actions. We have reviewed the records and the district court’s opinions and find no revers- ible error. We dismiss the appeals in Nos. 98-6761 and 98-6762, because Mills seeks to appeal non-existent orders. In Nos. 98-6913 and 98-6920, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. Owens; Mills v. Watkins, Nos. CA-97-3334-DKC; CA-97-3335- DKC (D. Md. June 4 & 5, 1998). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. Nos. 98-6761/98-6762 - DISMISSED Nos. 98-6913/98-6920 - AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer