UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.                                                                    No. 98-4603

FRED USI,
Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CR-97-334)

Submitted: January 29, 1999

Decided: April 9, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Alan R.L. Bussard, Towson, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Bat-
taglia, United States Attorney, Angela R. White, Assistant United
States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See
Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Fred Onos Usi was convicted pursuant to his guilty plea of one
count of conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distrib-
ute heroin. On appeal he alleges that the district court erred by not
granting him a downward adjustment for being a minor participant
under USSG § 3B1.2(b).1 Finding no error, we affirm.

As part of a reverse sting operation, government agents arranged
to sell one kilogram of heroin to a drug dealer in Chicago. The dealer
advised the agents that he would provide a courier who would fly into
Baltimore to pick up the drugs, swallow them, and return to Chicago
the next day. Usi arrived as scheduled and met with an undercover
agent. Usi advised the agent that he needed to buy smuggling materi-
als, which he listed, before he took possession of the heroin. Usi also
told the agent that he could swallow the full kilogram, stated that he
had previously smuggled drugs by swallowing them, and expressed
knowledge of the dealer's operation. The following day, Usi spent
three hours showing two undercover agents the proper methods for
packaging the drugs for smuggling. Usi was arrested shortly after he
took possession of the heroin. Usi made a full confession, during
which he admitted that he would be paid for $5,000 for his services.2

Usi bore the burden of showing that he was entitled to a reduction
in his base offense level, and the district court's factual determination
concerning his role in the offense will only be reversed if it was
clearly erroneous. See United States v. Campbell , 

, 46 (4th
Cir. 1991). We find that the record supports the district court's deci-
sion to deny Usi's request for a downward adjustment. It is well-
settled that courier status alone is insufficient to warrant the adjust-
ment. See United States v. Gordon, 

, 935 (4th Cir. 1990).
In the present case, the record shows that Usi was a sophisticated cou-
_________________________________________________________________
1 U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual (1997).
2 Although the district court stated that Usi admitted to being paid
$85,000, the record shows that this was merely a misstatement. The Gov-
ernment stipulated at trial that the actual amount was $5,000, and this
amount is also reflected in the plea agreement.

                    2
rier who was not only highly skilled in smuggling operations, but was
confident enough in his abilities to "teach" his methods to undercover
agents. Usi showed a significant amount of knowledge of the dealer's
activities, and was being paid a considerable sum of money for his
services.

Accordingly, we affirm Usi's conviction and sentence. We dis-
pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the material before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

                    3