Filed: Jun. 01, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1156 GERARD J. FALONI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUIS J. FREEH, Director, National Federal Bureau of Investigation; JIM EDGAR, Governor of Illinois; TOM CARPER, Mayor of Macomb, Illinois; WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, President of the United States, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-99- 94-L) Submitted: May 2
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1156 GERARD J. FALONI, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUIS J. FREEH, Director, National Federal Bureau of Investigation; JIM EDGAR, Governor of Illinois; TOM CARPER, Mayor of Macomb, Illinois; WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, President of the United States, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-99- 94-L) Submitted: May 25..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1156
GERARD J. FALONI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LOUIS J. FREEH, Director, National Federal
Bureau of Investigation; JIM EDGAR, Governor
of Illinois; TOM CARPER, Mayor of Macomb,
Illinois; WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, President
of the United States,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-99-
94-L)
Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 1, 1999
Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerard J. Faloni, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Gerard J. Faloni appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Faloni v. Freeh, No. CA-99-94-L (D. Md.
Jan. 21, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although the district court’s order was signed on January
19, 1999, and was stamp dated on January 20, 1999, the district
court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on
January 21, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered
on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the
district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray,
806 F.2d 1232,
1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).
2