Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alday v. Tecphy Division, 98-2150 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-2150 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 09, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2150 JAMES D. ALDAY; LORRI ALDAY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus TECPHY DIVISION FIRMINY, Defendant - Appellee, and FORTECH, INCORPORATED; C. H. POWELL COMPANY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-2356-2-18) Submitted: May 11, 1999 Decided: June 9, 1999 Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2150 JAMES D. ALDAY; LORRI ALDAY, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus TECPHY DIVISION FIRMINY, Defendant - Appellee, and FORTECH, INCORPORATED; C. H. POWELL COMPANY, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-2356-2-18) Submitted: May 11, 1999 Decided: June 9, 1999 Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Julian H. Toporek, Savannah, Georgia, for Appellants. Robert H. Brunson, Courtney A. Crook, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: James and Lorri Alday appeal the district court’s order grant- ing Appellee summary judgment in this diversity personal injury action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin- ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Alday v. Tecphy Division Firminy, No. CA-97-2356-2-18 (D.S.C. July 10, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer