Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Simkus v. Sizer, 98-7636 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 98-7636 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 15, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7636 JOHN GEORGE SIMKUS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1417-WMN) Submitted: May 28, 1999 Decided: June 15, 1999 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7636 JOHN GEORGE SIMKUS, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus FRANK C. SIZER, JR., Warden; J. JOSEPH CURRAN, JR., Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1417-WMN) Submitted: May 28, 1999 Decided: June 15, 1999 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John George Simkus, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Regina Hollins Lewis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: John George Simkus, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Simkus’ motions for a certificate of appealability and appointment of counsel, and we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Simkus v. Sizer, No. CA-98-1417-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer