Filed: Jul. 15, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6555 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENT L. JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-96-721, CA-98-1701) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 15, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kent L. Johnson, Appella
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6555 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus KENT L. JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CR-96-721, CA-98-1701) Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 15, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kent L. Johnson, Appellan..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-6555
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
KENT L. JOHNSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CR-96-721, CA-98-1701)
Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 15, 1999
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kent L. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea,
Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Kent Johnson appeals from the district court’s order denying
relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
1999). Johnson claimed that his attorney was ineffective for
failing to inform him of the safety valve provision set forth in
U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5C1.2 (1997). Because Johnson
did not meet the five criteria to establish eligibility under the
safety valve provision, he cannot show that he was prejudiced by
his attorney’s failure to inform him of the provision. See Strick-
land v. Washington,
466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2