Filed: Jul. 27, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1692 LUCILLE PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy; COMMANDER, NAVAL BASE SECURITY DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-98-604-2) Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1692 LUCILLE PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy; COMMANDER, NAVAL BASE SECURITY DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-98-604-2) Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999 Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-1692
LUCILLE PHILLIPS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Department
of the Navy; COMMANDER, NAVAL BASE SECURITY
DEPARTMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis-
trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.
(CA-98-604-2)
Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999
Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lucille Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Richard Leonard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Lucille Phillips appeals from a district court order dismiss-
ing without prejudice her complaint alleging employment discrimina-
tion. The court dismissed Phillips’ complaint based on her failure
to comply with its prior order directing her to particularize her
complaint. Because Phillips may proceed with this action by
amending her complaint to provide the information requested by the
court, her appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate
review. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2