Filed: Aug. 19, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6740 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD TIRRELL TERRY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-97- 63-L, CA-98-2903-L) Submitted: August 3, 1999 Decided: August 19, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opin
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6740 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD TIRRELL TERRY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-97- 63-L, CA-98-2903-L) Submitted: August 3, 1999 Decided: August 19, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opini..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6740 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RICHARD TIRRELL TERRY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CR-97- 63-L, CA-98-2903-L) Submitted: August 3, 1999 Decided: August 19, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Tirrell Terry, Appellant Pro Se. Joyce Kallam McDonald, As- sistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Richard Tirrell Terry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the ap- peal because we have already addressed all of Terry’s claims in his prior appeal. See United States v. Terry, No. 99-6228 (4th Cir. June 22, 1999) (unpublished). We dispense with oral argument be- cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
