UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6079 LUCIUS DRAFTS, Petitioner - Appellant, and EUGENE A. STAUCH, III; CARL FRAZIER GOOD; MICHAEL DOUGLAS MOORE; MARK WILES; VERNON LEE KINKLE; WALTER FORD; JEFFREY D. THOMAS; RICH- ARD E. BLACKBURN; SAMUEL L. MCGARITY; MARCUS CROOM; LARRY LADURBACK; STACEY GRIMSLEY; HAROLD LONNIE ROBERSON; DAVID WALLS; WILLIAM RAYNOR; WAYNE SHELLEY FLEMING; KEVIN MIDDLE- TON; ROGER WALKER; JOHN C. GRIFFIN; EDWARD G. FIELDS; LEONARD WILSON; TROY ABNEY; KENNETH OTT; WILLIAM KELLY, Petitioners, versus GERALDINE MIRO, Warden, Allendale Correctional Institution; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MICHAEL MOORE, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-96-3663-22BD) Submitted: August 19, 1999 Decided: August 25, 1999 Before WIDENER and KING, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Cir- cuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lucius Drafts, Appellant Pro Se. William Ansel Collins, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Lucius Drafts appeals from the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and Drafts’ motion to pro- ceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Drafts v. Miro, No. CA-96-3663-22BD (D.S.C. Dec. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2