Filed: Aug. 31, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6593 JERRY ALLEN HOLLOWAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-27-7) Submitted: August 17, 1999 Decided: August 31, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Allen Holloway, Appellant
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6593 JERRY ALLEN HOLLOWAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-27-7) Submitted: August 17, 1999 Decided: August 31, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Allen Holloway, Appellant P..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6593 JERRY ALLEN HOLLOWAY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-27-7) Submitted: August 17, 1999 Decided: August 31, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Allen Holloway, Appellant Pro Se. Marla Graff Decker, Assis- tant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Jerry Allen Holloway seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Holloway v. Angelone, No. CA-99-27-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 9, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
