Filed: Jul. 15, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-41291 Document: 00512307799 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 15, 2013 No. 12-41291 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS ALBERTO LUGO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-1162-1 Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
Summary: Case: 12-41291 Document: 00512307799 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED July 15, 2013 No. 12-41291 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. LUIS ALBERTO LUGO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-1162-1 Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM..
More
Case: 12-41291 Document: 00512307799 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
July 15, 2013
No. 12-41291
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
LUIS ALBERTO LUGO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:11-CR-1162-1
Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Luis Alberto Lugo appeals the within-guidelines sentence imposed
following his guilty plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute
marijuana. Lugo does not argue that his 100 month sentence is substantively
unreasonable, but argues only that the district court committed procedural
error and incorrectly calculated the applicable guidelines range by imposing a
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-41291 Document: 00512307799 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/15/2013
No. 12-41291
two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. §3B1.1(c). See Gall v. United
States,
552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007).
Whether a defendant was a leader or organizer under § 3B1.1 is a factual
determination that we review for clear error. United States v. Villanueva,
408
F.3d 193, 204 (5th Cir. 2005). Given the record evidence that Lugo paid his
cousin to act as a scout for Lugo’s criminal activities, we cannot say that the
district court clearly erred. See id.; United States v. Turner,
319 F.3d 716, 725
(5th Cir. 2003)(“When the evidence demonstrates that a defendant directed
another in his drug trafficking activities . . . sentence enhancement under
§ 3B1.1(c) is appropriate.”)
AFFIRMED.
2