Filed: Aug. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-41297 Document: 00512329418 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/02/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 2, 2013 No. 11-41297 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY PEREZ-BATISTA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-616-1 Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:*
Summary: Case: 11-41297 Document: 00512329418 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/02/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 2, 2013 No. 11-41297 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY PEREZ-BATISTA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-616-1 Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* T..
More
Case: 11-41297 Document: 00512329418 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/02/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 2, 2013
No. 11-41297
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ANTHONY PEREZ-BATISTA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:11-CR-616-1
Before WIENER, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Anthony Perez-Batista has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief and supplemental brief pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Batista has filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well
as Perez-Batista’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the
appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-41297 Document: 00512329418 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/02/2013
No. 11-41297
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
2