Filed: Aug. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10957 Document: 00512343386 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 16, 2013 No. 12-10957 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARTURO HERNANDEZ GUADARRAMA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-96-30 Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER C
Summary: Case: 12-10957 Document: 00512343386 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 16, 2013 No. 12-10957 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARTURO HERNANDEZ GUADARRAMA, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CR-96-30 Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CU..
More
Case: 12-10957 Document: 00512343386 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/16/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 16, 2013
No. 12-10957
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ARTURO HERNANDEZ GUADARRAMA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:11-CR-96-30
Before JONES, DENNIS, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Arturo Hernandez Guadarrama has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Guadarrama has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-10957 Document: 00512343386 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/16/2013
No. 12-10957
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2