Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Mario Gonzalez, 12-51186 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 12-51186 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-51186 Document: 00512347651 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-51186 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARIO GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-84-11 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA
More
     Case: 12-51186       Document: 00512347651         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/20/2013




              IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT   United States Court of Appeals
                                                                               Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 20, 2013
                                     No. 12-51186
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO GONZALEZ,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                         for the Western District of Texas
                             USDC No. 1:12-CR-84-11


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Mario Gonzalez has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 
632 F.3d 229
 (5th Cir. 2011).
Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer