Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-41221 Document: 00512346938 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-41221 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE AMADO PENA-MEDRANO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-213-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 12-41221 Document: 00512346938 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-41221 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE AMADO PENA-MEDRANO, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:12-CR-213-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. P..
More
Case: 12-41221 Document: 00512346938 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2013
No. 12-41221
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JOSE AMADO PENA-MEDRANO,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:12-CR-213-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Amado Pena-Medrano
raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Newson,
515 F.3d 374, 377-78 (5th Cir. 2008), which held that the Government may
decline to move for an additional one-point reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(b)
based on the defendant’s refusal to waive his right to appeal. The appellant’s
motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.