Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10941 Document: 00512346868 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-10941 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JONOTHAN GONZALEZ-CORTEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-48-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 12-10941 Document: 00512346868 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-10941 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JONOTHAN GONZALEZ-CORTEZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-48-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. P..
More
Case: 12-10941 Document: 00512346868 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2013
No. 12-10941
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JONOTHAN GONZALEZ-CORTEZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-48-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jonothan Gonzalez-
Cortez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez-Cortez has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue
for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-10941 Document: 00512346868 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-10941
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2