Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-41397 Document: 00512348209 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-41397 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GRACIANO LOPEZ-FAZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-759-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER C
Summary: Case: 12-41397 Document: 00512348209 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-41397 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. GRACIANO LOPEZ-FAZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:12-CR-759-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CU..
More
Case: 12-41397 Document: 00512348209 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2013
No. 12-41397
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
GRACIANO LOPEZ-FAZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:12-CR-759-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Graciano Lopez-Faz
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Lopez-Faz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-41397 Document: 00512348209 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-41397
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2