Filed: Aug. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-40654 Document: 00512347543 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-40654 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CIRILO CARRANZA, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-15-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
Summary: Case: 12-40654 Document: 00512347543 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 20, 2013 No. 12-40654 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CIRILO CARRANZA, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:12-CR-15-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA..
More
Case: 12-40654 Document: 00512347543 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
August 20, 2013
No. 12-40654
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CIRILO CARRANZA,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 2:12-CR-15-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Cirilo Carranza has moved for leave
to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).
Carranza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 12-40654 Document: 00512347543 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-40654
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2