Filed: Sep. 10, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-50767 Summary Calendar MARY D. MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CA-836 JN - - - - - - - - - - August 28, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary Monroe appeals the district court's affirmance of the Commissioner's
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-50767 Summary Calendar MARY D. MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CA-836 JN - - - - - - - - - - August 28, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary Monroe appeals the district court's affirmance of the Commissioner's ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-50767 Summary Calendar MARY D. MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SHIRLEY S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-94-CA-836 JN - - - - - - - - - - August 28, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Mary Monroe appeals the district court's affirmance of the Commissioner's decision denying her social security disability benefits. Monroe argues that the findings of the administrative law judge (ALJ) are not supported by relevant legal standards and substantial evidence. We have carefully reviewed the record and the arguments. We detect no error. Accordingly, we affirm for * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. - 2 - essentially the same reasons given by the district court. See Monroe v. Chater, No. A-94-CA-836 JN (W.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 1995). AFFIRMED.
