Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Morgan v. Ford, 96-40071 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 96-40071 Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 06, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-40071 Conference Calendar KELVIN B. MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus T. C. FORD, Dr. Coffield Unit; TDCJ-ID, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:93-CV-647 - - - - - - - - - - October 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Kelvin B. Morgan (#559701) appeals from the denial of his
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-40071 Conference Calendar KELVIN B. MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus T. C. FORD, Dr. Coffield Unit; TDCJ-ID, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:93-CV-647 - - - - - - - - - - October 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Kelvin B. Morgan (#559701) appeals from the denial of his postjudgment motion requesting relief pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) based on excusable neglect for not filing a timely appeal. Morgan argues that his failure to file a timely notice of appeal was caused by excusable neglect. We have reviewed the record and briefs of the parties and AFFIRM the magistrate judge’s denial * Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. - 2 - because the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion. Morgan v. Ford, No. 6:93-CV-647 (Dec. 5, 1995). AFFIRMED.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer