Felicia Jones v. United States Postal Service, 13-20295 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Number: 13-20295
Visitors: 49
Filed: Oct. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-20295 Document: 00512404047 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 10, 2013 No. 13-20295 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk FELICIA N. JONES, Plaintiff–Appellant v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant–Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC 4:13-MC-718 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Pend
Summary: Case: 13-20295 Document: 00512404047 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 10, 2013 No. 13-20295 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk FELICIA N. JONES, Plaintiff–Appellant v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant–Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC 4:13-MC-718 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Pendi..
More
Case: 13-20295 Document: 00512404047 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/10/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 10, 2013 No. 13-20295 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk FELICIA N. JONES, Plaintiff–Appellant v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant–Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC 4:13-MC-718 Before REAVLEY, JONES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Pending before the Court is Felicia Jones’s appeal of the district court’s denial of her Motion for Leave of Court to File Complaint/Motion. Based on Jones’s brief, excerpts, and the applicable law, the district court’s denial is AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Source: CourtListener
