Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rita Brown v. Sports Clips, 13-30097 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 13-30097 Visitors: 31
Filed: Oct. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-30097 Document: 00512404534 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/11/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 11, 2013 No. 13-30097 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk RITA BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JABEZ SPORT CLIPS, LA L.L.C., Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10-CV-852 Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Ri
More
Case: 13-30097 Document: 00512404534 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/11/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 11, 2013 No. 13-30097 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk RITA BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant v. JABEZ SPORT CLIPS, LA L.L.C., Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:10-CV-852 Before KING, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rita Brown, plaintiff-appellant in this Title VII racial harassment action against defendant-appellee Jabez Sport Clips, La, L.L.C., her prior employer, appeals the district court’s decision to admit Brown’s testimony, on cross- examination, regarding her two prior racial discrimination suits against another hair salon employer containing allegations similar to those made against Sport * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 13-30097 Document: 00512404534 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/11/2013 No. 13-30097 Clips in this case. The district court concluded that the probative value of the evidence of the “remarkably similar” prior suits, together with evidence of potentially fraudulent activity associated therewith, substantially outweighed the danger of unfair prejudice. We need not decide whether the district court erred in admitting the evidence because even if the court erred, the error was harmless. There was substantial other evidence weighing against Brown’s credibility and in favor of the jury’s verdict for Sport Clips. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer