Filed: Oct. 15, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-40188 Document: 00512407451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 15, 2013 No. 13-40188 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDY GUILMAR CHILEL-SOTO, also known as Edy Chilel Soto-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1801-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM,
Summary: Case: 13-40188 Document: 00512407451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 15, 2013 No. 13-40188 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. EDY GUILMAR CHILEL-SOTO, also known as Edy Chilel Soto-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1801-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ..
More
Case: 13-40188 Document: 00512407451 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 15, 2013
No. 13-40188
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
EDY GUILMAR CHILEL-SOTO, also known as Edy Chilel Soto-Lopez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:12-CR-1801-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Edy Guilmar Chilel-Soto raises
an argument that he correctly concedes is foreclosed by United States v.
Rodriguez,
711 F.3d 541, 562 n.28 (5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), petition for cert. filed
(June 6, 2013) (No. 12-10695), in which this court concluded that the generic,
contemporary definitions of “statutory rape” and “sexual abuse of a minor” do not
include the age-differential requirement that Chilel-Soto asserts is required.
The appellant’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment
of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.