Filed: Oct. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-51124 Document: 00512419321 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 12-51124 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN MANUEL MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-1317-1 Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURI
Summary: Case: 12-51124 Document: 00512419321 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 12-51124 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JUAN MANUEL MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:11-CR-1317-1 Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIA..
More
Case: 12-51124 Document: 00512419321 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2013
No. 12-51124
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
JUAN MANUEL MUNOZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:11-CR-1317-1
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Juan Manuel Muñoz raises
arguments that he concedes are foreclosed. See United States v. Rawls,
85 F.3d
240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996) (rejecting Commerce Clause-based challenge to 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary
affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file
a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.