Filed: Oct. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-41304 Document: 00512419301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 12-41304 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HECTOR OCAMPO-BARRERA, also known as Jaime Campos-Mendez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1197-1 Before JOLLY, JONES,
Summary: Case: 12-41304 Document: 00512419301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 12-41304 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. HECTOR OCAMPO-BARRERA, also known as Jaime Campos-Mendez, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1197-1 Before JOLLY, JONES, a..
More
Case: 12-41304 Document: 00512419301 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2013
No. 12-41304
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
HECTOR OCAMPO-BARRERA, also known as Jaime Campos-Mendez,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 7:12-CR-1197-1
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Hector Ocampo-Barrera raises
an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-
Escareno,
700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied,
133 S. Ct. 2044
(2013), which held that the sentence enhancement provided for in U.S.S.G.
§ 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) applies to a conviction for the federal crime of conspiracy to
commit a federal drug-trafficking offense. The appellant’s motion for summary
disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.